Land Rover Discovery 1990 vs Jeep Cherokee 1989
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.9 | 2.1 - 4.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 113 - 185 HP | 87 - 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 - 314 NM | 184 - 296 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 - 20.6 seconds | 9.5 - 22.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 - 16.4 | 9.1 - 14.2 | |
|
Land Rover Discovery petrol engines consumes on average 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jeep Cherokee. On average, a Land Rover Discovery with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Jeep Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.91 m | 1.62 m | |
| Land Rover Discovery is 25 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, width is practically the same , while the height of Land Rover Discovery is 29 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1290 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1970 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Discovery is 1.1 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Land Rover Discovery can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`720 | ~ 2`771 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |