Land Rover Defender 2007 vs Nissan X-Trail 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Land Rover Defender engine produces 28 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 40 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 7.1 | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Defender consumes 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Defender could require 585 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 630 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 2.03 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Land Rover Defender is larger. Land Rover Defender is 1 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 1 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 35 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1742 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 2 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Land Rover Defender can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |