Land Rover Defender 2007 vs Mercedes ML 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.4 (diesel) | 3.0 - 6.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 190 - 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 350 - 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5 - 9.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 8.4 - 16.5 | |
|
On average, Land Rover Defender equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 2.03 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Land Rover Defender is smaller, but higher. Land Rover Defender is 14 cm shorter than the Mercedes ML, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 21 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 551 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.8 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Land Rover Defender can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`500 | ~ 2`854 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |