Lada NIVA (2121) 1993 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 174 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 25 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Lada NIVA (2121) engine produces 64 HP less power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 56 NM less than Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 9.5 | |
|
The Lada NIVA (2121) is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lada NIVA (2121) consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that by driving the Lada NIVA (2121) over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 480 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 520 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| Suzuki Grand Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.74 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Lada NIVA (2121) is smaller. Lada NIVA (2121) is 18 cm shorter than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Lada NIVA (2121) is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 828 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lada NIVA (2121) has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |