Lada NIVA (2121) 1994 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.7 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 76 HP | 94 HP | |
Torque: | 125 NM | 138 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
Suzuki Grand Vitara is a more dynamic driving. Lada NIVA (2121) engine produces 18 HP less power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Due to the lower power, Lada NIVA (2121) reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 8.0 | |
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lada NIVA (2121) consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lada NIVA (2121) could require 480 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 56 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 370 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
500 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
Suzuki Grand Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.74 m | 3.92 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.64 m | 1.74 m | |
Lada NIVA (2121) is smaller. Lada NIVA (2121) is 18 cm shorter than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Lada NIVA (2121) is 10 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 210 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 828 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 9.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`610 | 1`600 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Lada NIVA (2121) has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |