Kia Sportage 2005 vs Land Rover Freelander 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 14.4 seconds | |
|
Kia Sportage is more dynamic to drive. Kia Sportage engine produces 28 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Land Rover Freelander. Thanks to more power Kia Sportage reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Kia Sportage consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Kia Sportage over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Kia Sportage consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Sportage might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Kia Sportage is smaller. Kia Sportage is 10 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Sportage is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 667 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1886 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Sportage is 0.8 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Kia Sportage can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`260 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Sportage has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |