Kia Sportage 1999 vs Land Rover Freelander 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 | 1.8 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 83 - 128 HP | 112 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 - 195 NM | 160 - 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.7 - 20.5 seconds | 11.1 - 15.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 11.8 | 7.6 - 12.4 | |
|
Kia Sportage petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Freelander. On average, Kia Sportage equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Kia Sportage is smaller. Kia Sportage is 2 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Sportage is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 640 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2220 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Sportage is 0.4 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Kia Sportage can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`955 | ~ 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Sportage has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |