Kia Sephia 1996 vs Seat Toledo 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
| Kia Sephia engine produces 5 HP more power than Seat Toledo, but torque is 5 NM less than Seat Toledo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.3 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Sephia consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Sephia could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Sephia is 7 cm shorter than the Seat Toledo, 3 cm wider, while the height of Kia Sephia is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Sephia is 0.6 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo, which means Kia Sephia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`350 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Seat Toledo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Kia Sephia, so Seat Toledo quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Sephia has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |