Kia Sephia 1996 vs Kia Shuma 1998
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 80 HP | 88 HP | |
Torque: | 120 NM | 135 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
Kia Sephia engine produces 8 HP less power than Kia Shuma, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Kia Shuma. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.9 | |
The Kia Shuma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Sephia consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Shuma, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Sephia could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
720 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
Kia Shuma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.25 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
Kia Sephia is smaller. Kia Sephia is 23 cm shorter than the Kia Shuma, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Sephia is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 328 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 780 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Sephia is 0.1 metres more than that of the Kia Shuma. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`350 | 1`600 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Kia Shuma has
| |