Kia Sephia 1996 vs Kia Shuma 1998

 
Kia Sephia
1996 - 1998
Kia Shuma
1998 - 2001
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.5 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 80 HP88 HP
Torque: 120 NM135 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds13.8 seconds
Kia Sephia engine produces 8 HP less power than Kia Shuma, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Kia Shuma.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.47.9
The Kia Shuma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Kia Sephia consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Shuma, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Sephia could require 75 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 590 km in combined cycle630 km in combined cycle
720 km on highway790 km on highway
Kia Shuma gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.25 m4.48 m
Width: 1.69 m1.71 m
Height: 1.39 m1.42 m
Kia Sephia is smaller.
Kia Sephia is 23 cm shorter than the Kia Shuma, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Sephia is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data328 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data780 litres
Turning diameter: 9.9 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Kia Sephia is 0.1 metres more than that of the Kia Shuma.
Gross weight (kg): 1`3501`600
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): no data1000
Pros and Cons:
    Kia Shuma has
    • more power
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv