Kia Sephia 1998 vs Seat Toledo 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 88 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.4 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
|
Seat Toledo is a more dynamic driving. Kia Sephia engine produces 12 HP less power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Seat Toledo. Due to the lower power, Kia Sephia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 8.5 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Sephia consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Sephia could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Toledo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 1 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Kia Shuma | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Audi A3, Seat Leon, Seat Ibiza | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Sephia is 1 cm shorter than the Seat Toledo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Sephia is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Sephia is 1.1 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo, which means Kia Sephia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`590 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Seat Toledo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Kia Sephia, so Seat Toledo quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Sephia has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |