Kia RIO 2009 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 97 HP | 94 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 131 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
| Kia RIO engine produces 3 HP more power than Chevrolet Aveo. Despite the higher power, Kia RIO reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km | |
|
The Kia RIO is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Kia RIO consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia RIO could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Kia RIO consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 460 km with real consumption | 420 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.31 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.50 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia RIO is 7 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Aveo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Kia RIO is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 375 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`535 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Kia RIO has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Kia RIO, so Kia RIO quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Chevrolet Aveo has
| |