Kia RIO 2009 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009

 
Kia RIO
2009 - 2011
Volkswagen Polo
2009 - 2014
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.3 Petrol1.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 97 HP105 HP
Torque: n/a NM175 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.3 seconds9.7 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving.
Kia RIO engine produces 8 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo. Due to the lower power, Kia RIO reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.25.3
Real fuel consumption: 7.4 l/100km6.3 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Kia RIO consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia RIO could require 135 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia RIO consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle840 km in combined cycle
860 km on highway1000 km on highway
600 km with real consumption710 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.99 m3.97 m
Width: 1.70 m1.68 m
Height: 1.47 m1.49 m
Both cars are similar in size. Kia RIO is 2 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 1 cm wider, while the height of Kia RIO is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data280 litres
Turning diameter: no data10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data1`570
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Kia RIO has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 24004400
Pros and Cons: Kia RIO has
  • lower price
Volkswagen Polo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv