Kia RIO 2009 vs Renault Clio 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 97 HP | 85 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Kia RIO is more dynamic to drive. Kia RIO engine produces 12 HP more power than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Kia RIO reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia RIO consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia RIO could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia RIO consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia RIO is 4 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Kia RIO is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 288 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`655 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Renault Clio has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Kia RIO, so Renault Clio quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Renault Clio has
| |