Kia RIO 2011 vs Nissan Tiida 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.6 | 1.5 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 123 HP | 105 - 126 HP | |
| Torque: | 121 - 220 NM | 153 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 - 16.1 seconds | 10.4 - 12.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 6.5 | 5.2 - 7.8 | |
|
Kia RIO petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Tiida. On average, Kia RIO equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Tiida. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.53 m | |
| Kia RIO is 11 cm shorter than the Nissan Tiida, width is practically the same , while the height of Kia RIO is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 467 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 467 litres | |
|
Kia RIO has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Kia RIO has 33 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Tiida. The Nissan Tiida may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 0.1 metres more than that of the Nissan Tiida. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`624 | ~ 1`697 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Nissan Tiida has
| |