Kia RIO 2011 vs Kia Cerato 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 123 HP | 130 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 121 - 220 NM | 157 - 194 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 - 16.1 seconds | 9.3 - 11.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 6.5 | 6.5 - 7.2 | |
|
Kia RIO petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Cerato. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Kia RIO is smaller, but slightly higher. Kia RIO is 19 cm shorter than the Kia Cerato, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Kia RIO is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 482 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Kia RIO has 18 litres more trunk space than the Kia Cerato. The Kia Cerato may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 0.1 metres less than that of the Kia Cerato. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`624 | ~ 1`740 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Kia Cerato has
| |