Kia RIO 2005 vs Mazda Demio 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 97 - 112 HP | 63 - 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 - 235 NM | 103 - 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 - 14.5 seconds | 13 - 16.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 7.2 | 6.0 - 7.9 | |
|
Kia RIO petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda Demio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Kia RIO is larger, but lower. Kia RIO is 17 cm longer than the Mazda Demio, 4 cm wider, while the height of Kia RIO is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 272 litres | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1107 litres | 1298 litres | |
|
Mazda Demio has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia RIO has 58 litres less trunk space than the Mazda Demio. This could mean that the Kia RIO uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Demio (by 191 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda Demio, which means Kia RIO can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`600 | ~ 1`475 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Mazda Demio has
| |