Kia RIO 2005 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Kia RIO
2005 - 2009
Chevrolet Aveo
2004 -
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.4 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel)1.2 - 1.6 (petrol)

Performance

Power: 97 - 112 HP72 - 106 HP
Torque: 125 - 235 NM104 - 145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.2 - 14.5 seconds11.1 - 13.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.7 - 7.25.5 - 7.6
Kia RIO petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Aveo.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.99 m4.30 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.47 m1.50 m
Kia RIO is smaller.
Kia RIO is 31 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Aveo, width is practically the same , while the height of Kia RIO is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 272 litres375 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1107 litresno data
Chevrolet Aveo has more luggage space.
Kia RIO has 103 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Aveo.
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 0.2 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Aveo.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`600~ 1`515
Safety:
Quality:
below average

low
Average price (€): 20001200
Pros and Cons: Kia RIO has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
Chevrolet Aveo has
  • only petrol engines available
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv