Kia RIO 2011 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.4 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 109 HP | 60 - 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 121 - 220 NM | 108 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 - 15.5 seconds | 7.3 - 16.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 - 6.3 | 3.8 - 7.5 | |
|
Kia RIO petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Skoda Fabia. On average, Kia RIO equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Kia RIO is larger, but lower. Kia RIO is 4 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 8 cm wider, while the height of Kia RIO is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 224 litres | 315 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia RIO has 91 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. This could mean that the Kia RIO uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`624 | ~ 1`626 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Kia RIO scores higher in safety tests. The Kia RIO scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |