Kia RIO 2011 vs Ford Fiesta 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.4 | 1.0 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 109 HP | 65 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 121 - 220 NM | 150 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 - 15.5 seconds | 9.4 - 16.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 - 6.3 | 3.3 - 5.9 | |
|
Kia RIO petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Fiesta. On average, Kia RIO equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
| Kia RIO is 10 cm longer than the Ford Fiesta, width is practically the same , while the height of Kia RIO is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 224 litres | 295 litres | |
|
Ford Fiesta has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia RIO has 71 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. This could mean that the Kia RIO uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Fiesta. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`624 | ~ 1`506 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Kia RIO scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia RIO has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |