Kia RIO 2015 vs Nissan Note 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 123 HP | 80 - 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 121 - 220 NM | 110 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 - 16.5 seconds | 11.7 - 13.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 - 6.4 | 3.6 - 5.1 | |
|
Kia RIO petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Note. On average, Kia RIO equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.09 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.53 m | |
| Kia RIO is 2 cm shorter than the Nissan Note, width is practically the same , while the height of Kia RIO is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 325 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
923 litres | 1495 litres | |
|
Nissan Note has more luggage space. Kia RIO has 37 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Note. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Note (by 572 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia RIO is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan Note. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`601 | ~ 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan Note has
| |