Kia Pride 1991 vs Rover 100 1990
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 73 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 135 NM | 117 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
Rover 100 is a more dynamic driving. Kia Pride engine produces 2 HP less power than Rover 100, but torque is 18 NM more than Rover 100. Due to the lower power, Kia Pride reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.8 | |
The Rover 100 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Pride consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 100, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Pride could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 37 litres | 35 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 490 km in combined cycle | 510 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.56 m | 3.52 m | |
Width: | 1.60 m | 1.56 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.38 m | |
Kia Pride is larger. Kia Pride is 4 cm longer than the Rover 100, 4 cm wider, while the height of Kia Pride is 8 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 205 litres | 229 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
510 litres | 552 litres | |
Rover 100 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia Pride has 24 litres less trunk space than the Rover 100. This could mean that the Kia Pride uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 100 (by 42 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Pride is 0.4 metres less than that of the Rover 100, which means Kia Pride can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`270 | 1`310 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Rover 100 has
| |