Kia Picanto 2017 vs Toyota Aygo 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 84 HP | 69 HP | |
| Torque: | 122 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 14.3 seconds | |
|
Kia Picanto is more dynamic to drive. Kia Picanto engine produces 15 HP more power than Toyota Aygo, whereas torque is 27 NM more than Toyota Aygo. Thanks to more power Kia Picanto reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 3.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Picanto consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Picanto could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Picanto consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 500 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Kia Picanto engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia RIO, Hyundai i20, Hyundai i10 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Aygo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Kia Picanto engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.60 m | 3.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.46 m | |
| Kia Picanto is 14 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Picanto is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 168 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1010 litres | no data | |
|
Kia Picanto has more luggage capacity. Kia Picanto has 87 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Picanto is 0.8 metres less than that of the Toyota Aygo, which means Kia Picanto can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`240 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Toyota Aygo scores higher in safety tests. The Toyota Aygo scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Kia Picanto has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Aygo has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Kia Picanto, so Kia Picanto quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Picanto has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |