Kia Picanto 2015 vs Skoda Citigo 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 66 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.6 seconds | 14.4 seconds | |
| Kia Picanto engine produces 6 HP more power than Skoda Citigo, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Kia Picanto reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Citigo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Picanto consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Picanto could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Picanto consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Citigo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.60 m | 3.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
| Kia Picanto is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Citigo, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Picanto is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 200 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
870 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Citigo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia Picanto has 51 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Citigo. This could mean that the Kia Picanto uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Picanto is 0.2 metres less than that of the Skoda Citigo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Kia Picanto has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Citigo has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Kia Picanto, so Kia Picanto quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Picanto has
|
Skoda Citigo has
| |