Kia Picanto 2017 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.2 | 1.0 - 1.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 67 - 100 HP | 71 - 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 96 - 172 NM | 88 - 106 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 - 14.3 seconds | 11.7 - 13.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 5.4 | 4.1 - 4.2 | |
|
Kia Picanto petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Space Star. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 141 mm (5.6 inches) | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.60 m | 3.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Kia Picanto is smaller. Kia Picanto is 20 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Picanto is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1010 litres | 912 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Kia Picanto has 20 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Star. The Mitsubishi Space Star may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Picanto (by 98 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Picanto is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`400 | ~ 1`333 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Picanto has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |