Kia Optima 2010 vs Skoda Superb 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 231 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Skoda Superb is a more dynamic driving. Kia Optima engine produces 20 HP more power than Skoda Superb, but torque is 19 NM less than Skoda Superb. Despite the higher power, Kia Optima reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.6 | |
|
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Optima consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Optima could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| Kia Optima gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Optima and Skoda Superb are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 436 litres | 565 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Kia Optima has 129 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Optima has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |