Kia Optima 2005 vs Kia RIO 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.7 | 1.1 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 188 HP | 75 - 123 HP | |
| Torque: | 189 - 305 NM | 121 - 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 - 11.7 seconds | 10.3 - 16.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 9.2 | 4.3 - 6.5 | |
|
Kia Optima petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia RIO. On average, Kia Optima equipped with diesel engines consume 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia RIO. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Kia Optima is larger. Kia Optima is 37 cm longer than the Kia RIO, 11 cm wider, while the height of Kia Optima is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 496 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
816 litres | no data | |
| Kia Optima has 4 litres less trunk space than the Kia RIO. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Optima is 1.3 metres more than that of the Kia RIO, which means Kia Optima can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`013 | ~ 1`624 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Kia RIO has
| |