Kia Optima 2005 vs Chrysler Sebring 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.7 | 2.0 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 - 188 HP | 140 - 235 HP | |
Torque: | 189 - 305 NM | 190 - 339 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 - 11.7 seconds | 10.3 - 11.3 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 9.2 | 6.2 - 9.9 | |
Kia Optima petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Sebring. On average, Kia Optima equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.74 m | 4.85 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.50 m | |
Kia Optima is smaller. Kia Optima is 12 cm shorter than the Chrysler Sebring, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Optima is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 496 litres | 441 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
816 litres | no data | |
Kia Optima has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Kia Optima has 55 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Sebring. The Chrysler Sebring may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.13 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Optima is 0.67 metres more than that of the Chrysler Sebring, which means Kia Optima can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`013 | ~ 2`040 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Optima has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |