Kia Optima 2010 vs Toyota Corolla 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 1.3 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 - 274 HP | 101 - 124 HP | |
| Torque: | 198 - 365 NM | 132 - 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 10.9 seconds | 10.4 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 - 8.8 | 5.8 - 7.2 | |
|
Kia Optima petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Corolla. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Kia Optima is larger, but slightly lower. Kia Optima is 31 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla, 7 cm wider, while the height of Kia Optima is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 436 litres | 450 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Kia Optima has 14 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Corolla. This could mean that the Kia Optima uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Optima is 1.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Kia Optima can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`994 | ~ 1`768 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |