Kia Optima 2010 vs Kia Optima 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 (petrol) | 1.7 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 - 274 HP | 48 - 278 HP | |
| Torque: | 198 - 365 NM | 180 - 365 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 10.9 seconds | 9.4 - 11.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 - 8.8 | 5.1 - 8.1 | |
|
Kia Optima 2010 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Optima 2013. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Optima 2010 and Kia Optima 2013 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 436 litres | 505 litres | |
|
Kia Optima 2013 has more luggage space. Kia Optima 2010 has 69 litres less trunk space than the Kia Optima 2013. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Optima 2010 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Kia Optima 2013, which means Kia Optima 2010 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`994 | ~ 2`049 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Optima has
|
Kia Optima has
| |