Kia Optima 2010 vs Honda Civic 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 1.3 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 - 274 HP | 95 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 198 - 365 NM | 123 - 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 10.9 seconds | 9.1 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 - 8.8 | 4.6 - 7.1 | |
|
Kia Optima petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Civic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Kia Optima is larger. Kia Optima is 36 cm longer than the Honda Civic, 8 cm wider, while the height of Kia Optima is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 436 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1190 litres | |
|
Honda Civic has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia Optima has 49 litres less trunk space than the Honda Civic. This could mean that the Kia Optima uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Optima is 0.8 metres more than that of the Honda Civic, which means Kia Optima can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`994 | ~ 1`679 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda Civic has
| |