Kia Clarus 1999 vs Citroen Xsara 2000

 
Kia Clarus
1999 - 2001
Citroen Xsara
2000 - 2002
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 133 HP137 HP
Torque: 171 NM190 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.8 seconds8.8 seconds
Citroen Xsara is a more dynamic driving.
Kia Clarus engine produces 4 HP less power than Citroen Xsara, whereas torque is 19 NM less than Citroen Xsara. Due to the lower power, Kia Clarus reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.17.7
The Citroen Xsara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Kia Clarus consumes 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Clarus could require 510 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres54 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 540 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
690 km on highway960 km on highway
Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen Xsara engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 13 years11 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Optima, Kia Carens, Kia MagentisInstalled on at least 6 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 407, Peugeot 206, Citroen Xsara Picasso
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Xsara might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.75 m4.37 m
Width: 1.78 m1.70 m
Height: 1.44 m1.42 m
Kia Clarus is larger.
Kia Clarus is 38 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara, 8 cm wider, while the height of Kia Clarus is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 304 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Kia Clarus is 0.1 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8401`100
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): no data1000
Pros and Cons:
    Citroen Xsara has
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • longer expected engine lifespan
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv