Kia Clarus 1999 vs Mazda 626 1999

 
Kia Clarus
1999 - 2000
Mazda 626
1999 - 2002
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 116 HP100 HP
Torque: 152 NM152 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.9 seconds12 seconds
Kia Clarus engine produces 16 HP more power than Mazda 626, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Kia Clarus reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.98.0
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Kia Clarus consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Clarus could require 435 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 550 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
680 km on highway960 km on highway
Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km560'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 626 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 11 years7 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Carens, Kia Shuma, Kia SephiaInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda Premacy
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Clarus might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Kia Clarus engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.75 m4.68 m
Width: 1.78 m1.71 m
Height: 1.44 m1.52 m
Kia Clarus is larger, but lower.
Kia Clarus is 7 cm longer than the Mazda 626, 7 cm wider, while the height of Kia Clarus is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 304 litres485 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1677 litres
Mazda 626 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Kia Clarus has 181 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626. This could mean that the Kia Clarus uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Kia Clarus is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda 626.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8401`840
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): no data600
Pros and Cons: Kia Clarus has
  • more power
Mazda 626 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv