Kia Clarus 1999 vs Mazda 626 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol) | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 133 HP | 100 - 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 - 171 NM | 152 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 13.9 seconds | 10.5 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 - 11.1 | 6.3 - 9.1 | |
|
Kia Clarus petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 626. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Kia Clarus is larger, but lower. Kia Clarus is 7 cm longer than the Mazda 626, 7 cm wider, while the height of Kia Clarus is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1580 litres | 1677 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia Clarus has 236 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626. This could mean that the Kia Clarus uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 626 (by 97 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Clarus is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda 626. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`846 | ~ 1`866 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Clarus has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |