Kia Clarus 1996 vs Alfa Romeo 166 1998

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Kia Clarus
1996 - 1999
Alfa Romeo 166
1998 - 2003
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol)2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 116 - 133 HP136 - 226 HP
Torque: 152 - 171 NM187 - 304 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 - 13.9 seconds7.8 - 9.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.3 - 12.07.3 - 13.0
Kia Clarus petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Alfa Romeo 166.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.70 m4.72 m
Width: 1.77 m1.82 m
Height: 1.42 m1.42 m
Kia Clarus is smaller, but slightly higher.
Kia Clarus is 2 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 166, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 424 litres500 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
764 litresno data
Alfa Romeo 166 has more luggage space.
Kia Clarus has 76 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 166.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Kia Clarus is 1 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 166, which means Kia Clarus can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`760~ 1`995
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data1200
Pros and Cons: Kia Clarus has
  • only petrol engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Alfa Romeo 166 has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv