Kia Cerato 2010 vs Volvo V40 2012
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 126 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Kia Cerato engine produces 24 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 83 NM less than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Kia Cerato reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 5.4 | |
|
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Cerato consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Cerato could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.44 m | |
| Kia Cerato is 11 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Cerato is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 335 litres | |
|
Kia Cerato has more luggage capacity. Kia Cerato has 105 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Cerato is 1 metres less than that of the Volvo V40, which means Kia Cerato can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |