Kia Cerato 2013 vs Toyota Corolla 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol) | 1.3 - 1.8 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 - 150 HP | 90 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 - 194 NM | 128 - 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 11.6 seconds | 10 - 12.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 7.2 | 4.1 - 6.6 | |
|
Kia Cerato petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Corolla. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Cerato is 6 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla, width is practically the same , while the height of Kia Cerato is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 482 litres | 452 litres | |
|
Kia Cerato has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Kia Cerato has 30 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Corolla. The Toyota Corolla may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Cerato is 0.8 metres less than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Kia Cerato can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`740 | ~ 1`776 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |