Kia Cerato 2013 vs Kia RIO 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol) | 1.1 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 - 150 HP | 75 - 123 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 - 194 NM | 121 - 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 11.6 seconds | 10.3 - 16.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 7.2 | 4.3 - 6.5 | |
|
Kia Cerato petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia RIO. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Kia Cerato is larger, but slightly lower. Kia Cerato is 19 cm longer than the Kia RIO, 8 cm wider, while the height of Kia Cerato is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 482 litres | 500 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Kia Cerato has 18 litres less trunk space than the Kia RIO. This could mean that the Kia Cerato uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Cerato is 0.1 metres more than that of the Kia RIO. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`740 | ~ 1`624 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
Kia RIO has
| |