Kia Ceed 2010 vs Volvo C30 2009
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 109 HP | |
Torque: | 255 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
Kia Ceed engine produces 6 HP more power than Volvo C30, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Volvo C30. Despite the higher power, Kia Ceed reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 4.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
The Volvo C30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Ceed consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Ceed could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Ceed consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 52 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
1150 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
800 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
Volvo C30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 15 years | 5 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai i30, Kia Cerato | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo S40, Volvo V50 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.26 m | 4.27 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.44 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Kia Ceed and Volvo C30 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 251 litres | |
Kia Ceed has more luggage capacity. Kia Ceed has 89 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C30. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Ceed is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo C30. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | 1`780 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Kia Ceed has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volvo C30, so Kia Ceed quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 4200 | 4800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Volvo C30 has
| |