Kia Ceed 2007 vs Toyota Auris 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 255 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Kia Ceed is more dynamic to drive. Kia Ceed engine produces 25 HP more power than Toyota Auris, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Toyota Auris. Thanks to more power Kia Ceed reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 5.5 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Auris is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Kia Ceed consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris, which means that by driving the Kia Ceed over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Kia Ceed consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 22 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Hyundai i30, Hyundai Accent, Kia Venga | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Yaris, Toyota iQ | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Auris might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Kia Ceed engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Kia Ceed is larger, but slightly lower. Kia Ceed is 2 cm longer than the Toyota Auris, 3 cm wider, while the height of Kia Ceed is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1300 litres | 1355 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Kia Ceed has 14 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Auris. This could mean that the Kia Ceed uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Auris (by 55 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Ceed is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Auris, which means Kia Ceed can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`820 | 1`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Toyota Auris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Toyota Auris, so Toyota Auris quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Toyota Auris has
| |