Kia Ceed 2007 vs Renault Megane 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 NM | 151 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is a more dynamic driving. Kia Ceed engine produces 1 HP less power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Renault Megane. Due to the lower power, Kia Ceed reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Ceed is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Ceed consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that by driving the Kia Ceed over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Ceed consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai i30, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Hyundai i20 | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Clio, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.46 m | |
| Kia Ceed is 3 cm shorter than the Renault Megane, 1 cm wider, while the height of Kia Ceed is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 534 litres | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1664 litres | 1600 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Kia Ceed has 14 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane. The Renault Megane may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Ceed (by 64 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`820 | 1`795 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Renault Megane has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Renault Megane, so Renault Megane quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Renault Megane has
| |