Kia Ceed 2015 vs Fiat Stilo 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Kia Ceed is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Fiat Stilo is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
Engines: | 1.0 - 1.6 | 1.4 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 100 - 136 HP | 80 - 150 HP | |
Torque: | 137 - 300 NM | 128 - 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 13.1 seconds | 9.2 - 13.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 - 6.8 | 5.6 - 8.3 | |
Kia Ceed petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Fiat Stilo. On average, Kia Ceed equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Stilo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.51 m | 4.52 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.49 m | 1.57 m | |
Kia Ceed is 2 cm shorter than the Fiat Stilo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Kia Ceed is 9 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 528 litres | 510 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1642 litres | no data | |
Even though the car is shorter, Kia Ceed has 18 litres more trunk space than the Fiat Stilo. The Fiat Stilo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Ceed is 0.5 metres less than that of the Fiat Stilo, which means Kia Ceed can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`859 | ~ 1`225 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | low | |
Average price (€): | 9200 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Ceed has
|
Fiat Stilo has
| |