Kia Carnival 2002 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 144 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 262 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.2 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
| Kia Carnival engine produces 30 HP more power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 48 NM more than Chrysler Grand Voyager. Despite the higher power, Kia Carnival reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 8.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Carnival is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Carnival consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that by driving the Kia Carnival over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Carnival consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Carnival gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Hyundai Terracan | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.93 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Kia Carnival is smaller. Kia Carnival is 15 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 302 litres | 671 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4880 litres | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage space. Kia Carnival has 369 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Grand Voyager. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Carnival is 1 metres more than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means Kia Carnival can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`665 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Carnival has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |