Kia Carnival 2002 vs Chrysler Town & Country 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Diesel | 3.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 144 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 278 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Kia Carnival engine produces 30 HP less power than Chrysler Town & Country, but torque is 32 NM more than Chrysler Town & Country. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 10.8 | |
|
The Kia Carnival is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Carnival consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Town & Country, which means that by driving the Kia Carnival over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Kia Carnival gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.93 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Kia Carnival is smaller. Kia Carnival is 17 cm shorter than the Chrysler Town & Country, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Carnival is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 302 litres | 153 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 153 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 302 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4754 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`665 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Carnival has
|
Chrysler Town & Country has
| |