Kia Carnival 2002 vs Kia Carnival 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 189 HP | |
| Torque: | 224 NM | 249 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Kia Carnival 2002 engine produces 39 HP less power than Kia Carnival 2006, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Kia Carnival 2006. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 10.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Kia Carnival 2006 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.93 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.82 m | |
| Kia Carnival 2002 is 12 cm longer than the Kia Carnival 2006, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Carnival 2002 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 302 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3320 litres | 1666 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Kia Carnival 2002 has 62 litres less trunk space than the Kia Carnival 2006. This could mean that the Kia Carnival 2002 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Carnival 2002 (by 1654 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Carnival 2002 is 1.4 metres more than that of the Kia Carnival 2006, which means Kia Carnival 2002 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`555 | 2`765 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Carnival has
|
Kia Carnival has
| |