Kia Carnival 2002 vs Hyundai H1 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 224 NM | 181 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 20.6 seconds | |
|
Kia Carnival is more dynamic to drive. Kia Carnival engine produces 38 HP more power than Hyundai H1, whereas torque is 43 NM more than Hyundai H1. Thanks to more power Kia Carnival reaches 100 km/h speed 6.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 13.4 | |
|
The Kia Carnival is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Carnival consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai H1, which means that by driving the Kia Carnival over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 650 km on highway | ||
| Kia Carnival gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Kia Carnival) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Hyundai H1) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai H1 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Rover 75, Rover 400 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.93 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.89 m | |
|
Kia Carnival is larger, but lower. Kia Carnival is 23 cm longer than the Hyundai H1, 8 cm wider, while the height of Kia Carnival is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 302 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3320 litres | 3295 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Kia Carnival has 62 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai H1. This could mean that the Kia Carnival uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Carnival (by 25 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Carnival is 3.1 metres more than that of the Hyundai H1, which means Kia Carnival can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`555 | 2`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Carnival has
|
Hyundai H1 has
| |