Kia Carnival 2001 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 149 HP | |
| Torque: | 324 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Kia Carnival engine produces 19 HP less power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 36 NM less than Chrysler Grand Voyager. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.93 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Kia Carnival is smaller. Kia Carnival is 18 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Carnival is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 302 litres | 920 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4130 litres | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage space. Kia Carnival has 618 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Grand Voyager. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Carnival is 1 metres more than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means Kia Carnival can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`550 | 2`630 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Carnival has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |