Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 199 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 82 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 161 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Thanks to more power Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 15.8 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 5.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 870 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 8.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 410 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Wrangler engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Dodge Grand Caravan, Chrysler Pacifica | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Wrangler engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.62 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 7 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 10 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 141 litres | 442 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1219 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 301 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`268 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 24 800 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |