Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Lexus RX 2003
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 199 HP | 204 HP | |
Torque: | 315 NM | 283 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 9 seconds | |
Lexus RX is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 5 HP less power than Lexus RX, but torque is 32 NM more than Lexus RX. Due to the lower power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 12.2 | |
The Jeep Wrangler is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus RX, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 72 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
740 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
Lexus RX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.22 m | 4.74 m | |
Width: | 1.87 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.80 m | 1.68 m | |
Jeep Wrangler is 52 cm shorter than the Lexus RX, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 12 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 141 litres | 439 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2130 litres | |
Lexus RX has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 298 litres less trunk space than the Lexus RX. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1 metres less than that of the Lexus RX, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`268 | 2`380 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 24 800 | 6800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Lexus RX has
| |