Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Volvo XC90 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Wrangler engine produces 8 HP less power than Volvo XC90, but torque is 10 NM more than Volvo XC90. Despite less power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 8.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC90 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70, Volvo XC60 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but slightly higher. Jeep Wrangler is 59 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 141 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 141 litres | 613 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1837 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Volvo XC90 has more luggage space (by 472 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 2.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 24 800 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |