Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Opel Mokka 2012

 
Jeep Wrangler
2007 - 2017
Opel Mokka
2012 - 2016
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.8 Diesel1.7 Diesel

Performance

Power: 177 HP130 HP
Torque: 410 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.3 seconds9.4 seconds
Jeep Wrangler engine produces 47 HP more power than Opel Mokka, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Opel Mokka. Despite the higher power, Jeep Wrangler reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.75.1
Real fuel consumption: 11.8 l/100km6.1 l/100km
The Opel Mokka is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 4.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 690 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 5.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka.
Fuel tank capacity: 66 litres54 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle1050 km in combined cycle
800 km on highway1220 km on highway
550 km with real consumption880 km with real consumption
Opel Mokka gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.28 m
Width: 1.87 m1.78 m
Height: 1.80 m1.66 m
Jeep Wrangler is 6 cm shorter than the Opel Mokka, 10 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 14 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 141 litres356 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1372 litres
Opel Mokka has more luggage space.
Jeep Wrangler has 215 litres less trunk space than the Opel Mokka.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.4 metres less than that of the Opel Mokka, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`5001`959
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 24 8009600
Pros and Cons: Jeep Wrangler has
  • more power
Opel Mokka has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv